Supreme Court granting executive-created entity (DOGE) access to confidential Social Security records represents severe constitutional damage across multiple dimensions. Rule_of_law (4.5): Court enabling extrajudicial access to protected data undermines statutory privacy frameworks and administrative law principles. Separation (4.8): Judiciary facilitating executive overreach into protected citizen data without clear legislative authorization; DOGE operates outside normal agency structure. Civil_rights (4.2): Mass surveillance potential affecting 330M+ Americans' most sensitive personal data (SSNs, earnings, medical disability info). Capture (3.8): Court serving executive political project ('efficiency initiative') over institutional independence. Corruption (2.5): Potential for data misuse in politically-motivated targeting. High severity multipliers: durability (1.25) - precedent enables future data grabs; precedent (1.3) - normalizes executive access to protected databases. Mechanism modifier 1.4 for policy_change creating new access rights. Scope 1.3 for federal+broad affecting entire population. B-score elevated (28.4) due to outrage_bait (privacy violation), novelty (unprecedented DOGE powers), and strong pattern_match to surveillance state narratives. Intentionality moderate (9) - serves executive expansion but also genuine (if concerning) efficiency goals. D-score +50.1 clearly indicates List A, but both scores exceed 25 making this Mixed classification - real constitutional damage with significant hype amplification.