This event represents routine congressional oversight theater with zero constitutional damage. A congressman visiting a farm to assess trade policy impacts is standard legislative activity with no mechanism affecting constitutional structures. The 'policy_change' mechanism tag is misapplied - this is a congressional visit responding to existing trade policy, not a policy change itself. Trade disputes, even significant ones, do not constitute constitutional damage unless they involve abuse of emergency powers, violation of congressional authority, or other structural harms - none present here. The B-score is minimal (5.69) reflecting modest media appeal of the 'farmer hurt by trade war' narrative but lacking viral potential or significant strategic manipulation. This is textbook legislative noise: routine oversight activity with economic policy implications but zero constitutional dimension.