A-score: Rule of law (4.5) reflects aggressive enforcement with extreme financial penalties creating legal uncertainty and disproportionate punishment. Civil rights (4.0) captures targeting of vulnerable immigrant population with potentially ruinous fines. Separation (2.0) for executive enforcement action without clear legislative authorization for such extreme penalties. Mechanism modifier 1.25 for enforcement action with precedent-setting severity multiplier 1.15 for extreme penalty amounts. Federal scope 1.15. Final A=4.38. B-score: Layer 1 (14.85/27.5=54%) driven by outrage bait (8) from shocking $1.8M figure, media friendliness (8) for dramatic headline, novelty (7) of extreme penalty amount. Layer 2 (11/22.5=49%) shows mismatch (6) between penalty severity and offense, pattern match (7) with enforcement escalation narratives. Intentionality (9/15) for announcement timing, enforcement theater, chilling effect design yields 0.55 weight. Final B=26.93. Delta=-22.55 strongly negative with B>>25 indicates List B: high-hype enforcement theater with limited constitutional damage given lawsuit challenges extreme penalties and reversibility through courts.