Routine judicial dismissal of immigration lawsuit. Rule_of_law=2 (court functioning normally, upholding executive authority), civil_rights=2 (individual deportation affects one person's rights but no systemic violation), separation=1 (judiciary deferring to executive on immigration). Narrow population impact (single doctor), judicial mechanism reduces modifier to 0.9, federal scope with limited precedent yields 0.85 modifier. A-score: 3.44. B-score driven by sympathetic plaintiff (Brown Medicine doctor) creating moderate outrage potential and media interest, but limited viral/meme potential. Layer2 shows pattern-matching to immigration debate narratives. Final B=13.47. Both scores well below thresholds (A<25, B<25), no meaningful mechanism for constitutional damage, individual case without broader systemic implications.