A-score (15.1): Conditioning disaster aid on political compliance represents significant constitutional damage across multiple drivers. Rule_of_law (4) reflects weaponization of federal disaster relief mechanisms outside statutory frameworks. Separation (4) captures executive branch using emergency powers for political leverage against state government. Election (3) reflects potential voter suppression/coercion through withholding aid. Capture (3) and corruption (3) reflect using federal resources for political ends. Civil_rights (2) for potential disparate impact on vulnerable populations. Severity multipliers: precedent (1.2) for dangerous template of conditional disaster relief, durability (1.1) for potential lasting impact on federal-state relations. Mechanism_modifier (0.85) for norm_erosion_only - no formal policy change yet, just announced intention. Scope_modifier (0.85) for single_state affecting broad population. B-score (30.4): High Layer 1 (27.5/50): outrage_bait (8) - conditioning wildfire aid generates visceral response, media_friendliness (8) - simple narrative of withholding disaster relief, meme_ability (6) - 'aid with strings' concept, novelty (5) - echoes prior Trump-California conflicts. Layer 2 (28/50): timing (8) - during active wildfire crisis maximizes attention, mismatch (7) - announcement vs actual policy implementation unclear, pattern_match (7) - fits Trump administration's California antagonism pattern, narrative_pivot (6) - shifts from disaster response to political conflict. Intentionality (11/15): explicit political leverage, strategic announcement timing, media amplification, partisan framing. Intent_weight 0.55 yields Layer 2 contribution of 15.4. Final B-score: 27.5 + 15.4 = 42.9, modulated to 30.4. Delta: -15.3 strongly favors List B classification.