This event scores exceptionally high on constitutional damage (67.9) due to the extraordinary nature of DOJ filing a complaint against a sitting federal judge hearing a case against administration policy. Rule_of_law (4.5) reflects the weaponization of judicial oversight mechanisms to potentially influence ongoing litigation. Separation (5.0) captures the direct assault on judicial independence - the executive branch attempting to pressure/remove a judge overseeing a challenge to its own policy represents a fundamental breach of separation of powers. Civil_rights (3.0) reflects the underlying transgender military ban litigation. Capture (3.5) indicates institutional weaponization of DOJ complaint processes. Corruption (2.5) reflects abuse of official mechanisms for political ends. High mechanism modifier (1.4) for judicial_legal_action targeting judicial independence itself. Severity multipliers elevated: durability (1.2) as this creates chilling effects on judicial independence, reversibility (1.1) as damage to judicial norms is difficult to undo, precedent (1.3) as this is highly unusual and norm-breaking. B-score (26.5) is also elevated due to novelty (8) of such an action, outrage_bait (7), and pattern_match (7) with broader judicial pressure narratives. However, D-score of +41.4 clearly indicates List A classification despite both scores exceeding 25, as constitutional damage vastly exceeds distraction elements.